Why does no one seem to take Bloggers seriously?

Since my study induced blogging hiatus has temporarily ended for a short while I thought I would talk about a topic that has been bothering me for a long time now. I’m particularly proud of my blog, it means a sentimentally large amount to me but when the time comes for me to talk about it in real life I tend to get quite shy and feel very geeky about the topic. People seem surprised that I blog (possibly because I’m awesome and it’s as though they can’t believe I blog) and seem to snigger about the concept. It makes me wonder though that considering these people spend hours on Facebook every day why am I the one to be derided at about blogging?

I think the problem is the major misconceptions that people have about bloggers. When I told a colleague that I blog his response to me was: “what, do you talk about how you woke up in the morning, went to the toilet then brushed your teeth?”. For some reason the common idea is that blogging is all about having an online “Dear Diary” session. Frankly that conception annoys me greatly!

I know that ultimately I cannot be compared to an investigative journalist who reports on facts but what’s the difference between myself and a normal opinion piece in a magazine? Before you tell me: “Saul, you’re being a narcissist here” think about it. I mean the only real difference is a proof reader/sub-editor which I unofficially have. Bloggers opinions are often very well informed and much more relevant in terms of time frame than a newspaper or magazine.

Does anyone have any ideas on why blogging is considered second rate (especially in South Africa) compared to other Web 2.0 concepts such as social networking? Surely the debate and opinion of thousands of individuals is vastly more useful than say Super Poke?

PS: Shout out to Tal as promised!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • muti

Enjoy this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed.

About the Author